Sunday, February 17, 2008

Crickets #2

Although Sammy Harkham ’s Crickets #2 continues the serial Black Death begun in #1, the issue marks a radical departure in his approach to the title, signaled most visibly by the stunning cover, in which bold colors run into and around drawings of the comic’s many characters.

Issue 2 is an anthology, featuring 13 stories that range in length from a single panel to 15 pages (for the second part of Black Death, the sole story in #1.) And there's a new focus: comedy. Scenes of slap-stick humor weave their way throughout many pieces, with characters tripping, falling into (and out of) wells, and getting buckets stuck on their head. All of this action is accompanied by cartoony stars, sound effects, and curly motion/emotion lines drawn in a style reminiscent of early 20th-century newspaper strips like Rudolph Dirks’s Katzenjammer Kids.

Crickets:

Katzenjammer Kids:

While physical comedy is common, Harkham is equally at home working in many different modes: the fantasy aspects of Black Death, the harsh reality of father-daughter drama in Mother Fucker, the bible adaptation of Elisha, and light comic autobiography—a series of strips recounts moments from a tour with cartoonists Kevin H. and Anders Nilsen (with guest appearances from Gary Panter and C. F.). Harkham edits the massive and influential international art/comics anthology Kramer Ergot, and Crickets 2 reads a little like an issue of MAD magazine might if they put him in charge . . .

Like many of the artists I admire, Harkham creates stories that seamlessly shift between different emotional registers. Black Death, a picaresque narrative in which a wounded man, a Golem, and a donkey wander through a forest and encounter all sorts of dilemmas, is equal parts physical comedy and psychological drama. It moves between scenes of slapstick and explorations of Jewish mysticism (with a touching 3-page black and white flashback about the Golem’s origin and exile)

and ends with a horrifying, perfectly-paced cliff-hanger. Harkham ’s beautiful fine line work ensures that every story (even the one with the Johnny Ryan punch-line) has a sense of delicacy, no matter how high or low the comedy, or how violent the scene. The panels are always beautiful to look at, especially Black Death’s forest scenes, which are colored in a way that's a little denser and looser than issue 1. Here's a panel from #2:

from #1:

Harkham is one of group of younger cartoonists deeply interested in the medium’s history, and his work makes it clear that he thinks carefully about the techniques he uses. The issue begins with a story about Napoleon (the general and gag cartoonist) that explores how drawing eyes as dots affects a reader’s reaction to a character. This approach is fundamental for Harkham, and so the opening story works as a kind of commentary on the narratives to follow, and it encourages readers to think about his cartooning styles in general.


[One of the things that works well in the above panels is the way that, after a discussion of empathy and drawing, Harkham shifts to a very long shot of the army in which no eyes can be seen, withdrawing from us the thing he had just discussed.] And Napoleon’s struggle with a deadline prefigures Harkham ’s own; two of the short strips towards the issue’s end deal with the gap between issues of Crickets.

The comic is full of magical transformations (the Golem), grotesque characters (The Elephant Man), and violence, bringing together Harkham ’s interesting in religious traditions, horror movies (he draws himself as a werewolf in #1), and freaks. In Elisha, he retells the story of the biblical prophet in a dead-pan, lightly comic manner in which the dramatic cadence of biblical language is replaced by casual, 21st-century conversational dialogue -- yet it maintains a kind of intensity. The story is only 2 pages long, but at nearly 70 panels it has a density comparable to many entire comic books (I read a recent Marvel comic in 3 minutes, less time than it took to read Elisha).

[The book has a few funny visual puns like the one above: the holy man with his 'head in the clouds'.] The prophet revives a dead boy by breathing into his mouth as the prophet's face melts into the boy’s, a transformation that’s echoed on the issue’s cover as a face melts into thick streams of color. In a way, these kinds of transformations are symbolic of the issue's approach to genres, in which so many tropes from one genre blend into another.

Harkham's restrained use of color is a real highlight -- below is a sequence from the comic's last strip, which uses a palette different from the others:


This strip returns to characters from Harkham's Somersaulting, which appeared in Drawn and Quarterly Showcase 3. Here's a row of panels from Somersaulting that shows another approach to color and demonstrates Harkham's sparse sense of panel composition -- I also like the dramatic contrast from panel to panel (a lot of the connecting actions are 'left out') which makes for an unsual sequence:


If all you knew about 'alternative comics' came from sources like the message boards at comicon.com, you might get the idea that an art comic or an art comics anthology is just autobiographical or fictional stories about guys whining or doing nothing. But, Crickets is a great response to any such argument: Harkham tells a wide range of stories and displays considerable skill at all of the crafts (drawing, dialogue, lettering, coloring, pacing, etc) necessary for great cartooning.

12 comments:

a. kleon said...

Oh man, I forgot this was out! Thanks for the reminder. Great overview of what makes Sammy great.

K. Parille said...

Thanks - I'm still trying to get the post to look right - it's ok in Explorer and bad in Mozilla

Matt said...

just put in an order for this yesterday. can't wait to read it and be further embarrassed that i ever try to draw anything.

Dustin Harbin said...

Awesome review, and shockingly short, considering how much there is to talk about in Crickets 2. I was just preparing to write my own review this week, but this is so well-said that I'd just be aping it, so I'll just link to yours instead.

K. Parille said...

Dustin,

Thanks for reading it - also please check your email - I just sent you a message --

Inkstuds said...

I was really impressed with this issue. He is a comparatively young cartoonist in the scope of his body of work, and its really interesting the changes that are happening in his comix, as he works through his own kinks.

He, and his contemporaries are producing some exciting work that is really pushing the medium forward.

p.r. said...

hey, tim hensley never seems to enable comments on his posts. I really wanted to give him kudos on the december 07 Suiho Tagawa Slide Show. :(

Froth said...

Sammy Harkham__
championing comics
that are finally surfacing
after so darn long.

it's all in the beard

Jed said...

Nice review, but I must say Crickets is cold, angry, and ultimately boring comics. Characterization was horrible. Crudity in place of substance. Napoleon! was interesting though.

K. Parille said...

Jed,

I didn't find it cold at all - especially since I thought that many of the stories were funny. . .

jed said...

Yes, there was a certain brand of humor in these stories, but that’s not quite what I mean. The humor itself is coming from a cold place. Now, I’m not looking for warm fuzzies in my comics, but neither am I looking for the pissy schoolyard humor on display here.

The punchlines aren’t entertaining—they’re rather easy in that they resort to simple gross-out humor (poontang, bitches, guts full of cum, farts etc). Harkham may be attempting to balance the supposed high-minded, arty side of his comic with some ribald humor, but the problem is the heights he reaches aren’t that high. The comic is just dragged to a base level as a result. And the White River Junction comic trashing James Sturm is inexcusable. Best case scenario-- this is simply ribbing among friends. I hope it is. But still, a comic is hardly the appropriate venue to air such personal grievances. I don’t laugh. I see Harkham as a stunted juvenile comics artist full of himself. He’s a far better editor than cartoonist, unfortunately.

Dustin Harbin said...

This is funny that you mention this purported negative side of Crickets, Jed. I was rereading Kramer's 6 last night, and I remember distinctly wondering why so many of the strips in it seemed so incredibly negative and dark, when Sammy's stuff, while often somber (Poor Sailor, Somersaulting), still seems very light to me. It might be the playful cartooning, which in and of itself takes so much more skill and talent than a bunch of endless self-examination and remonstration.

I don't know. I dropped out of high school. But I do disagree--as someone with little interest in stuff that's all dark and antisocial, I thoroughly enjoyed reading Crickets 2 cover to cover, without exception. The Sturm thing, and the similar references to D&Q staffers, was definitely weird, but was also one of the more thought-provoking parts of the whole book. The best autobio work seems to put you in the cartoonist's brain, so suddenly you're not just reading a funny comic about a guy with arrows in his head (haw!), but identifying with the artist, who despite his great acclaim, still occasionally leaves his fly open and (presumably) is forced to wipe his own butt. I love it!